Impacto de la presentación tardía al servicio de Urgencias por cólico renal agudo en los resultados bioquímicos y clínicos / Impact of a delayed presentation to the emergency department for acute renal colic on biochemical and clinical outcomes

Introducción y objetivo Verificar el impacto en los resultados bioquímicos y clínicos de la demora en acudir al servicio de Urgencias (SU) ante un cólico renal agudo. Materiales y métodos Los datos se recogieron retrospectivamente en 3 instituciones de 2 países europeos, desde el 1 de enero hasta el 30 de abril del 2020. Se incluyó a los pacientes que acudieron a Urgencias con un cólico renal unilateral o bilateral causado por urolitiasis confirmada por imagen durante el periodo de estudio. La consulta en el SU después de 24 h desde el inicio de los síntomas se consideró tardía. Los pacientes que acudieron antes de las 24 h desde el inicio de los síntomas se incluyeron en el grupo A y los pacientes que se presentaron después de las 24 h se adjudicaron al grupo B. Se compararon los parámetros clínicos y bioquímicos, así como el manejo recibido por cada paciente. Resultados Se analizó a 397 pacientes que acudieron a Urgencias con urolitiasis confirmada (grupo A, n = 199; grupo B, n = 198). La mediana (RIC) de demora hasta la consulta fue de 2 días (1,5-4). En el momento de la consulta, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los 2 grupos de pacientes en cuanto a los síntomas como fiebre y dolor en el flanco, o la mediana de los niveles séricos de creatinina, proteína C reactiva y leucocitos. No se encontraron diferencias en cuanto al tratamiento conservador o quirúrgico. Conclusiones La demora > 24 h hasta acudir al SU no se asocia a un empeoramiento de los parámetros bioquímicos ni de los resultados clínicos. La mayoría de los pacientes con dolor lumbar agudo no siempre necesitan acudir de forma inmediata a urgencias, pudiendo ser tratados en consultas externas (AU)

Introduction and objective To verify the impact of delay on biochemical and clinical outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute renal colic. Materials and methods Data were retrospectively collected from 3 institutions of 2 European countries between 01 January and 30 April 2020. Patients who presented to the ED with unilateral or bilateral renal colic caused by urolithiasis confirmed by imaging tests during the study period were included. A presentation after 24 hours since the onset of symptoms was considered a delay. Patients presenting before 24 hours from the symptom onset were included in Group A, while the patients presenting after 24 hours in Group B. Clinical and biochemical parameters and management were compared. Results 397 patients who presented to ED with confirmed urolithiasis were analyzed (Group A, n = 199; Group B, n = 198. The median (IQR) delay in presentation was 2 days (1,5-4). At presentation, no statistically significant differences were found amongst the 2 groups of patients regarding presenting symptoms such as fever and flank pain, and the median serum levels of creatinine, C reactive protein and white blood cells. No differences were found in terms of conservative or operative management. Conclusions Delay in consultation >24 hours is not associated with worsening biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes. Most patients with acute loin pain do not necessarily need urgent attendance to the ED and may be managed in the outpatients (AU)

Impact of a delayed presentation to the emergency department for acute renal colic on biochemical and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To verify the impact of delay on biochemical and clinical outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from three institutions of two European countries between 01 January and 30 April 2020. Patients who presented to the ED with unilateral or bilateral renal colic caused by urolithiasis confirmed by imaging tests during the study period were included. A presentation after 24 h since the onset of symptoms was considered a delay. Patients presenting before 24 h from the symptom onset were included in Group A, while the patients presenting after 24 h in Group B. Clinical and biochemical parameters and management were compared. RESULTS: A total of 397 patients who presented to ED with confirmed urolithiasis were analyzed (Group A, n = 199; Group B, n = 198. The median (IQR) delay in presentation was 2 days (1,5-4). At presentation, no statistically significant differences were found amongst the two groups of patients regarding presenting symptoms such as fever and flank pain, and the median serum levels of creatinine, C reactive protein and white blood cells. No differences were found in terms of conservative or operative management. CONCLUSION: Delay in consultation >24 h is not associated with worsening biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes. Most patients with acute loin pain do not necessarily need urgent attendance to the ED and may be managed in the outpatients.

Penile granulomas after BCG instillations. A case report and review of literature.

Penile granulomas has been rarely reported in the setting of BCG instillations. We present a 70 year-old male with multiple penile granulomas during BCG instillations due a high-grade urothelial bladder cancer. Histopathological study revealed granulomatous structures with central necrosis as seen after BCG therapy. Local treatment with cryotherapy has been shown to be effective. This case emphasizes the importance to suspect this adverse effect in patients under BCG treatment.

Evaluación de las tendencias y presentación clínica de pacientes con cólico nefrítico que acuden al servicio de urgencias durante la era pandémica del COVID-19 / Assessment of trends and clinical presentation in the emergency department of patients with renal colic during the COVID-19 pandemic era

INTRODUCCIÓN: Nuestra hipótesis es que la pandemia por COVID-19, y el estado de alarma impuesto por los gobiernos, pueden haber retrasado las visitas a urgencias por cólicos nefríticos, debido al miedo a contagiarse en los centros sanitarios. Este atraso en acudir a los servicios de urgencias puede llevar a un empeoramiento clínico y aumentar las complicaciones relacionadas con la enfermedad o el tratamiento recibido. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos una revisión retrospectiva de 3 centros hospitalarios en España e Italia. Fueron incluidos pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias por cólico renal (unilateral o bilateral) secundario a litiasis confirmadas en pruebas de imagen durante los 45 días previos y posteriores a la declaración del estado de alarma de cada país. Se recolectaron datos demográficos, síntomas y signos de presentación, análisis de sangre y orina, pruebas de imagen, y manejo terapéutico. El análisis estadístico se realizó entre dos grupos, Grupo A: pacientes que acudieron antes de la declaración del estado de alarma y Grupo B: pacientes que acudieron tras la declaración del estado de alarma. RESULTADOS: Un total de 397 pacientes que acudieron a urgencias por cólicos nefríticos secundarios a litiasis fueron incluidos en el estudio, 285 (71,8%) en el Grupo A y 112 (28,2%) en el Grupo B (p < 0,001). Un total de 135 (47,4%) en el Grupo A y 63 (56,3%) en el Grupo B (p = 0,11) admitieron haber pospuesto su búsqueda de atención médica urgente. En el momento de la valoración inicial, no se encontraron diferencias entre ambos grupos en los niveles de creatinina sérica, leucocitosis, fiebre, oliguria, dolor, o hidronefrosis. Además, no se observaron diferencias en relación con la estancia media, ingreso en el servicio de urología, o necesidad de tratamientos invasivos. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestros resultados muestran una disminución significativa de atenciones en urgencias por cólicos nefríticos tras la declaración del estado de alarma en España e Italia. A diferencia de otros estudios publicados recientemente, no encontramos diferencias en la estancia media, ingreso al servicio de urología, o necesidad de tratamientos invasivos en pacientes que se presentaron antes y después del estado de alarma

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that the recent COVID-19 pandemic may lead to a delay in renal colic patients presenting to the Emergency Department due to the fear of getting infected. This delay may lead to a more severe clinical condition at presentation with possible complications for the patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of data collected from three institutions from Spain and Italy. Patients who presented to Emergency Department with unilateral or bilateral renal colic caused by imaging confirmed urolithiasis during the 45 days before and after each national lockdown were included. Data collected included patients’ demographics, biochemical urine and blood tests, radiological tests, signs, symptoms and the therapeutic management. Analysis was performed between two groups, Group A: patients presenting prior to the national lockdown date; and Group B: patients presenting after the national lockdown date. RESULTS: A total of 397 patients presented to Emergency Department with radiology confirmed urolithiasis and were included in the study. The number of patients presenting to Emergency Department with renal/ureteric colic was 285 (71.8%) patients in Group A and 112 (28.2%) patients in Group B (p < 0.001). The number of patients reporting a delay in presentation was 135 (47.4%) in Group A and 63 (56.3%) in Group B (p = 0.11). At presentation, there were no statistical differences between Group A and Group B regarding the serum creatinine level, C reactive protein, white blood cell count, fever, oliguria, flank pain and hydronephrosis. In addition, no significant differences were observed with the length of stay, Urology department admission requirement and type of therapy. CONCLUSION: Data from our study showed a significant reduction in presentations to Emergency Department for renal colic after the lockdown in Spain and Italy. However, we did not find any significant difference with the length of stay, Urology department admission requirement and type of therapy

Assessment of trends and clinical presentation in the emergency department of patients with renal colic during the COVID-19 pandemic era. / Evaluación de las tendencias y presentación clínica de pacientes con cólico nefrítico que acuden al servicio de urgencias durante la era pandémica del COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that the recent COVID-19 pandemic may lead to a delay in renal colic patients presenting to the Emergency Department due to the fear of getting infected. This delay may lead to a more severe clinical condition at presentation with possible complications for the patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of data collected from three institutions from Spain and Italy. Patients who presented to Emergency Department with unilateral or bilateral renal colic caused by imaging confirmed urolithiasis during the 45 days before and after each national lockdown were included. Data collected included patients' demographics, biochemical urine and blood tests, radiological tests, signs, symptoms and the therapeutic management. Analysis was performed between two groups, Group A: patients presenting prior to the national lockdown date; and Group B: patients presenting after the national lockdown date. RESULTS: A total of 397 patients presented to Emergency Department with radiology confirmed urolithiasis and were included in the study. The number of patients presenting to Emergency Department with renal/ureteric colic was 285 (71.8%) patients in Group A and 112 (28.2%) patients in Group B (p<0.001). The number of patients reporting a delay in presentation was 135 (47.4%) in Group A and 63 (56.3%) in Group B (p=0.11). At presentation, there were no statistical differences between Group A and Group B regarding the serum creatinine level, C reactive protein, white blood cell count, fever, oliguria, flank pain and hydronephrosis. In addition, no significant differences were observed with the length of stay, Urology department admission requirement and type of therapy. CONCLUSION: Data from our study showed a significant reduction in presentations to Emergency Department for renal colic after the lockdown in Spain and Italy. However, we did not find any significant difference with the length of stay, Urology department admission requirement and type of therapy.

Antidepressant activity of Litsea glaucescens essential oil: identification of ß-pinene and linalool as active principles.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Litsea glaucescens (Lauraceae) has been used in Mexican Traditional Medicine to relieve illness related to central nervous system, such as epilepsy, fright and sadness. In this study, L. glaucescens essential oil properties on central nervous system were evaluated in mice using different behavioral tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The essential oil was obtained by hydrodistillation and analyzed by GC/MS. Identification of major compounds was also carried out by comparison with authentic samples. The psychopharmacological profile of L. glaucescens essential oil, and some its major compounds, were evaluated in mice using several experimental models: forced swimming test (FST: Antidepressant-like activity), open field test (OFT: Spontaneous locomotor activity), elevated plus-maze (EPM: Anxiolytic-like activity), exploratory cylinder (ECT: Sedative-like activity), rotarod (motor coordination) and traction performance (myo-relaxant effect) the essential oil and active principles was administered intraperitoneally. RESULTS: The essential oil showed antidepressant-like activity at doses of 100 and 300 mg/Kg. The monoterpenes ß-pinene and linalool were identified as the two main active principles of the essential oil, and showed antidepressant-like and sedative-like activity. Eucalyptol, limonene and α-pinene they did not show antidepressant-like activity, and were not further tested. CONCLUSIONS: L. glaucescens essential oil showed antidepressant activity, ß-pinene and linalool were identified as its active principles. These results support the use of L. glaucescens in Mexican Traditional Medicine for the treatment of sadness.

Reconstrucción Mamaria mediante Colgajo Tram Libre / Mammary Reconstruction with Free Tramp Flap

Los autores en el presente trabajo exponen su experiencia en reconstrucción mamaria por medio de colgajo TRAM libre en 30 casos, 27 mujeres, y durante un periodo de 20 meses. Las indicaciones fundamentales para efectuar la reconstrucción con esta técnica fueron: que la piel estuviera radiada; intolerancia o no deseo de llevar implantes y cuando la mama contralateral era grande y de base ancha. La reconstrucción se realizó primariamente en 4 casos y en el resto se efectuó de forma secundaria. En 2 casos se abortó la realización por no encontrar vasos en la zona axilar receptora y se optó por la reconstrucción por medio de colgajo TRAM pediculado. Se realizó la reconstrucción bilateral en 3 mujeres. Se produjo necrosis completa en 2 colgajos y parcial en 4. En cuanto a la pared abdominal hubo abombamiento de la misma en 3 pacientes. Se analizan los tiempos medios quirúrgicos tanto en la realización del colgajo TRAM un¡ y bilateral, siendo de 5 horas 51 minutos y 8 horas 15 minutos. Se concluye que con esta técnica es posible realizar reconstrucciones con un grado de fiabilidad competitivo con respecto a otras técnicas, aportando ventajas en cuanto a menor número de complicaciones en el colgajo, siendo las necrosis parciales menos frecuentes y con una menor tendencia a la debilidad de la pared abdominal y a la aparición de hernias (AU)

[Influence of colloidal bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, and amoxycillin on Helicobacter pylori and gastroduodenal ulcer healing]. / Influencia del subcitrato de bismuto coloidal, metronidazol y amoxicilina sobre el Helicobacter pylori y sobre la cicatrización de la úlcera gastro-duodenal.

In many works performed in different countries, including Cuba, the microorganism Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is involved in the etiopathogenesis and relapse of gastroduodenal ulcer (GDU). In a previous work, we saw that under treatment of Colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) or Metronidazole (M) alone during 4 weeks, the percentage of Hp clearance obtained was very low. So, we decided to extend the treatment with a unique drug up to 6 weeks or to make a combination of drugs during 4 weeks. 114 patients with GDU endoscopic diagnosis and Hp positive by urease test antral biopsy were located in 5 schedules of treatment: 1) CBS 480 mg daily during 6 weeks; 2)M 1 g daily during 6 weeks; 3) CBS 480 mg daily plus M 750 mg daily during 4 weeks; 4) CBS 480 mg daily plus Amoxycillin (A) 1500 mg daily during 4 weeks and 5) M 750 mg daily plus Amoxycillin 1500 daily during 4 weeks. Endoscopy and urease test were repeated at the end of treatment. Healing of ulcer was obtained in 83.3%; 36.4%; 89.2%; 91.9% and 54.6% respectively. Hp clearance was reached in 55.6%; 27.3%; 67.6%; 70.3% and 27.3% respectively. So, the schedules of treatment less effective (concerning both healing and Hp clearance) were M during 6 weeks and M plus A during 4 weeks. It has been reported that Hp strains may become resistant to nitroimidazolics in the course of treatment and that this resistance could be diminished by the coadministration of CBS. We recommend in GDU-Hp positive a treatment with CBS during 6 weeks or the combination of CBS, which action is basically local, with an antibiotic such as M (no more than two weeks) or Amoxycillin during 4 weeks.